Liquidity & Technical

Liquidity & Technical

The tape is institutionally tradable but capacity-constrained: ₹90 crore of average daily traded value supports a 5% position for funds up to roughly ₹1,800 crore (~$188M) AUM at 20% ADV participation, beyond which sizing becomes the bottleneck. Price action is bearish — a death cross has held since August 2025, the stock sits 21% below its 200-day moving average and 16% above its 52-week low, and the December 2025 capitulation candle stamped the most recent regime change with conviction.

Portfolio implementation verdict

5d capacity @20% ADV (₹ crore)

88.8

Largest issuer position cleared in 5d

1.31

Supported AUM, 5% weight (₹ crore)

1,777

ADV 20d / Mkt Cap

1.32

Technical score (-6 to +6)

-3

Price snapshot

Current price (₹)

550.05

YTD return

-25.6

1-year return

-38.0

52w position (0=low, 100=high)

15.8

Beta proxy (vs Nifty)

1.05

The stock has surrendered roughly half of its 2024 advance: from a ₹1,387 all-time high posted in January 2025 the shares now sit at ₹550. Year-to-date and one-year returns are deeply negative; the 52-week percentile of 16 says the tape is closer to capitulation than complacency.

Critical chart — full-history price with 50/200-day SMAs

Loading...

Price is below the 200-day moving average by 21%. The decade-long chart shows three regimes: a low-base accumulation (2016-2022, ₹20-130 corridor), a parabolic 2023-2024 PM-KUSUM rerating to ₹1,387, and a year-long unwind that has retraced about 60% of the advance. Today's tape is a confirmed downtrend, not a sideways consolidation.

Relative strength

Loading...

Momentum — RSI and MACD

Loading...
Loading...

RSI sits at 50 — neutral, no divergence to lean on. The more interesting tell is the MACD histogram: after a deeply negative print through Nov-Dec 2025 (the climactic sell-off into the death cross retest at ₹456), histogram has been positive for two months and is now compressing toward zero. That is a classic "first bounce" momentum profile — useful for a trader, not yet a regime change.

Volume, volatility and sponsorship

Loading...
No Results
Loading...

The volume signal is unambiguous. December 11-15, 2025 saw three of the ten largest single-day volume spikes in the company's listed history (16-27× the 50-day average, with closes at ₹628 / ₹650 / ₹752 and a +15.7% blow-off candle on the 15th). That cluster marked the recent local high; the slide from ₹752 to ₹550 has happened on declining weekly volume — a classic distribution-then-drift pattern. Realized volatility has stayed in the 50-60% band since the parabolic 2024 advance and currently reads 52% (between the 10-year p50 and p80 bands), so the option-implied risk premium is normal-to-elevated rather than complacent.

Institutional liquidity panel

This block is the buy-side decision tool: at what size can a fund act, and over how many days?

ADV 20d (M shares)

1.62

ADV 20d (₹ crore)

90.1

ADV 60d (M shares)

1.53

ADV / Mkt Cap

1.32

Annual turnover

329

ADV of ₹90 crore on a ₹6,800 crore market cap means 1.32% of the float trades each day and annual share turnover is more than 3× outstanding — well above the global mid-cap median. There is real two-way flow.

Fund-capacity table

How big a fund can build a target weight in five trading days?

No Results

At a sane 10% ADV participation, this stock supports a 5% target weight for funds up to roughly ₹888 crore (~$94M); at a more aggressive 20% ADV participation, that headroom doubles to ₹1,777 crore (~$188M). For a $1B-plus mandate, even a 2% weight is a one-month build — which is implementable, but the fund effectively becomes the marginal price discovery for that month.

Liquidation runway

How many days to fully unwind hypothetical issuer-level positions?

No Results

A 1% issuer-level stake exits in four trading days at 20% ADV or eight days at 10% — comfortably inside the five-day institutional benchmark only at the more aggressive participation rate. A 2% stake is a two-week unwind at the conservative rate, which is the threshold beyond which exit risk becomes a real consideration.

Daily-range proxy: the 60-day median high-low range is 3.74% of close — well above the 2% threshold the playbook flags as elevated impact cost. Real-world execution will give back 30-50bp per side beyond mid-quote, so VWAP/dark-pool routing is the right default for institutional builds.

The largest issuer-level position that clears in five trading days at 20% ADV is approximately 1.3% of market cap (~₹89 crore); at 10% ADV, that drops to 0.65% (~₹44 crore).

Technical scorecard and stance

No Results

Stance — bearish on a 3-to-6 month horizon, with a tactical-bounce caveat. The death cross has held for nine months, price is firmly below the 200-day, the 1-year return is -38%, and the December 2025 capitulation cluster looks like distribution rather than washout. RSI and MACD show a short-term bounce but no bullish divergence at the lows, and the rerating that took the stock from ₹130 to ₹1,387 was a single-thematic narrative (PM-KUSUM solar pumps) that the tape is now repricing.

Two levels: a confirmed close above ₹600 (current 100-day SMA, and the supply zone left by January-2026 distribution) would mark the first credible higher-high since the August-2025 death cross; a sustained close above the 200-day at ₹700 is required to flip the regime back to constructive. To the downside, a break of the 52-week low at ₹456 opens the door to a full retracement of the 2023 leg, with the prior 2023 base at ₹250-300 the next visible support. Liquidity is not the binding constraint here — execution is feasible up to roughly $188M-AUM at a 5% weight. The constraint is timing: this is a watchlist name until either ₹600 reclaims on volume, or ₹456 breaks (validating the bear thesis and offering a second entry at materially lower prices).